<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1st HDR photograph</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.michaeljohngrist.com/2008/11/1st-hdr-photograph/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.michaeljohngrist.com/2008/11/1st-hdr-photograph/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:16:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MJG</title>
		<link>http://www.michaeljohngrist.com/2008/11/1st-hdr-photograph/comment-page-1/#comment-1319</link>
		<dc:creator>MJG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 03:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaeljohngrist.com/?p=831#comment-1319</guid>
		<description>Vince- Great tips, thanks. There are some awesome HDR images out there- inspiring stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vince- Great tips, thanks. There are some awesome HDR images out there- inspiring stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince</title>
		<link>http://www.michaeljohngrist.com/2008/11/1st-hdr-photograph/comment-page-1/#comment-1306</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 05:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaeljohngrist.com/?p=831#comment-1306</guid>
		<description>Interesting... I&#039;ve been doing that with some of the pics on my photoblog for a couple of years now, using Photoshop. Didn&#039;t know it had a name - HDR - nor that other people were into it. Cool.

Tony - you can do a moving subject, but it takes more work. Just focus on the moving subject when he is there. Then take a picture of the background when he is not there, to get those colors right. You&#039;ll need to cut and paste and blend, but it&#039;s doable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting&#8230; I&#8217;ve been doing that with some of the pics on my photoblog for a couple of years now, using Photoshop. Didn&#8217;t know it had a name &#8211; HDR &#8211; nor that other people were into it. Cool.</p>
<p>Tony &#8211; you can do a moving subject, but it takes more work. Just focus on the moving subject when he is there. Then take a picture of the background when he is not there, to get those colors right. You&#8217;ll need to cut and paste and blend, but it&#8217;s doable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJG</title>
		<link>http://www.michaeljohngrist.com/2008/11/1st-hdr-photograph/comment-page-1/#comment-1272</link>
		<dc:creator>MJG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaeljohngrist.com/?p=831#comment-1272</guid>
		<description>Jason- Yeah, it&#039;s a fair point- it&#039;s not a conventional photograph, it&#039;s a digital manipulation.

Tony- With a regular camera I think a moving subject would be impossible, though with portraiture, if you could get the subject to sit totally still- and of course you used a tripod- it&#039;s do-able. I&#039;ve seen one, it looked weird, but not bad. As for all in one shot- Jason who commented above told me about RAW images that higher level cameras can take- which capture much more light vs. dark information than a regular shot- thus allowing you to re-balance things digitally after-wards, much like an HDR shot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason- Yeah, it&#8217;s a fair point- it&#8217;s not a conventional photograph, it&#8217;s a digital manipulation.</p>
<p>Tony- With a regular camera I think a moving subject would be impossible, though with portraiture, if you could get the subject to sit totally still- and of course you used a tripod- it&#8217;s do-able. I&#8217;ve seen one, it looked weird, but not bad. As for all in one shot- Jason who commented above told me about RAW images that higher level cameras can take- which capture much more light vs. dark information than a regular shot- thus allowing you to re-balance things digitally after-wards, much like an HDR shot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.michaeljohngrist.com/2008/11/1st-hdr-photograph/comment-page-1/#comment-1271</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaeljohngrist.com/?p=831#comment-1271</guid>
		<description>This isn&#039;t going to work for a moving subject- or indeed- for portriature- or is it? Is there a way you can take all your different exposures at once?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t going to work for a moving subject- or indeed- for portriature- or is it? Is there a way you can take all your different exposures at once?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.michaeljohngrist.com/2008/11/1st-hdr-photograph/comment-page-1/#comment-1257</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaeljohngrist.com/?p=831#comment-1257</guid>
		<description>Ha, I&#039;m one of those purists!  I&#039;m not against HDR and even started to try it myself.  I just wouldn&#039;t want it to be called a photograph.  I think it should be called an &quot;HDR image.&quot;  

They would be good to use as creative images in various print and online media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha, I&#8217;m one of those purists!  I&#8217;m not against HDR and even started to try it myself.  I just wouldn&#8217;t want it to be called a photograph.  I think it should be called an &#8220;HDR image.&#8221;  </p>
<p>They would be good to use as creative images in various print and online media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJG</title>
		<link>http://www.michaeljohngrist.com/2008/11/1st-hdr-photograph/comment-page-1/#comment-1256</link>
		<dc:creator>MJG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 03:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaeljohngrist.com/?p=831#comment-1256</guid>
		<description>Hey Al- Yes you can do it with your digital camera, you just need the right HDR post-production software. In this case, Photomatix Pro. I think some cameras can do this kind of thing in camera- which is very cool, but probably only very expensive top-of-the-range models. Photomatix costs $99, but you can get a trial version from their website for free. 

Mike- Yeah I looked at that link- some of the stuff is amazing- though there are some photography purists who look on it as &#039;cheating&#039;. I don&#039;t really worry about that though, and am looking forward to giving it a real go at the next haikyo I visit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Al- Yes you can do it with your digital camera, you just need the right HDR post-production software. In this case, Photomatix Pro. I think some cameras can do this kind of thing in camera- which is very cool, but probably only very expensive top-of-the-range models. Photomatix costs $99, but you can get a trial version from their website for free. </p>
<p>Mike- Yeah I looked at that link- some of the stuff is amazing- though there are some photography purists who look on it as &#8216;cheating&#8217;. I don&#8217;t really worry about that though, and am looking forward to giving it a real go at the next haikyo I visit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
